ArticleClinical and experimental nephrology2025
Evaluation of renal fibrosis using scanning acoustic microscopy.
Article in Clinical and experimental nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRenal fibrosis is strongly correlated with renal functional outcomes. Therefore, this is a significant finding in determining renal prognosis. There are various reports on the imaging evaluation of renal fibrosis, but these are not well established. Scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) uses ultra-high-frequency ultrasound to visualize tissues in just over a minute. SAM can simultaneously measure acoustic data such as speed of sound (SOS). SOS indicates the elasticity (stiffness) of a material. In this study, we aimed to compare and evaluate SAM acoustic intensity images and SOS data with light microscopy images of renal lesions, especially renal fibrosis.
methodsRenal specimens containing fibrosis were selected. The acoustic intensity images were compared to PAS-stained images. SOS data of the tubulointerstitium were compared with Masson's trichrome (MT)-stained images. The blue intensity of MT staining, which indicates fibrosis, was numerically valued using image-processing software. Furthermore, the correlations between it and the SOS values were evaluated.
resultsThe acoustic intensity images suggested tubular atrophy and interstitial expansion in the same areas as in the PAS staining. SOS values of interstitial expansion with fibrosis were higher than normal area, interstitial expansion without fibrosis. A weak positive correlation was observed between the SOS values and the blue intensity of MT staining.
conclusionsSOS data can be used to evaluate renal fibrosis. The combination of SOS data and MT-stained images enables a more detailed evaluation of renal fibrosis. This study can contribute to the evaluation of renal fibrosis and has potential clinical applications in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.