Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821561›Full record

ReviewAnnals of intensive care2025

Biomarkers of sepsis-induced coagulopathy: diagnostic insights and potential therapeutic implications.

Anaïs Curtiaud, Toshiaki Iba, Eduardo Angles-Cano, Ferhat Meziani, Julie Helms

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anaïs CurtiaudFaculté de Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, F-67091, cedex, France.
Toshiaki IbaDepartment of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eduardo Angles-CanoInnovative Therapies in Haemostasis, Université Paris Cité - INSERM U-1140, Paris, 75006, France.
Ferhat MezianiFaculté de Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, F-67091, cedex, France.
Julie HelmsFaculté de Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, 1, place de l'Hôpital, Strasbourg, F-67091, cedex, France. Julie.helms@chru-strasbourg.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0895-6800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing coagulopathy in septic patients remains challenging in intensive care. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) indeed presents with complex pathophysiology, complicating timely diagnosis. Epidemiological data indicate a significant prevalence of DIC in septic patients, with mortality rates up to 60%. Despite advances, current biomarker-based diagnostic tools often fail to provide early and accurate detection. This review evaluates the utility and limitations of traditional and emerging biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and DIC. We also assess the effectiveness of anticoagulant therapy guided by biomarker-based diagnostic criteria.

Indexed as

CoagulopathyDisseminated intravascular coagulationSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39821561
PMCPMC11739444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.