Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821499›Full record

ArticleCommunity mental health journal2025

The Stepping Stone Clubhouse Evaluation: Exploring Members' Experiences, Service Engagement, and Perceived Impact of the Clubhouse International Model.

Brianna S Fjeldsoe, Kathryn Vitangcol, Tayla Lamerton, Melanie Sennett, Daniel Helton, Fotini Hardy, Marianne Wyder, Zoe Cunningham, Martina O McGrath, Morag Roseby and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brianna S FjeldsoeEnable Health Consulting, The University of Queensland (School of Public Health (Adjunct)), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3800-4173
Kathryn VitangcolEnable Health Consulting, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6279-8033
Tayla LamertonEnable Health Consulting, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9754-3639
Melanie SennettStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Daniel HeltonStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Fotini HardyStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0304-8213
Marianne WyderMetro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Stepping Stone Clubhouse Management Committee, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Zoe CunninghamQueensland Mental Health Commission, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Martina O McGrathStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Morag RosebyStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew McLeanStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Scott BrownStepping Stone Clubhouse, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sheleigh LawlerSchool of Public Health, The Unversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. s.lawler@sph.uq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-5771-0551

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation provides non-clinical social support for adults living with a diagnosed mental illness or self-reported mental ill-health (referred to as 'members'). The Stepping Stone Clubhouse in Brisbane, Australia was evaluated between August 2022 and August 2023 using a participatory action research approach. Data was sourced from member surveys, member interviews, and an existing Clubhouse Member Database. Outcomes included members' self-reported psychosocial recovery, social connectedness, quality of life, frequency of hospitalizations, and their attainment of employment and/or education aspirations. In this cross-sectional evaluation, it was hypothesized that existing members (membership: 11 months - 28 years) would report better outcomes than new members (membership: 0-14 days). In total, 161 existing members and 76 new members completed a survey. Twenty-three members also participated in a semi-structured interview. Participants were aged on average 47.1 years (± 13.5), 62% were male and 31% had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. Existing members reported better scores than new members for: three of the four psychosocial recovery domains (Functional Recovery: 78.0% vs. 74.0%, p = 0.01; Symptom Management Recovery 69.5% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.03; Social Recovery 74.3% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.01); social connection with other members (38.1 vs. 32.2, p = 0.03) and staff (44.5 vs. 38.1, p = 0.02); quality-of-life summary scores (4.6 vs. 4.1, p = 0.01), and rates of mental health-related hospitalization (16% vs. 41%, p < 0.01). Existing members were also more likely to be in some form of employment, compared to new members (p = 0.01). There were no significant differences between existing and new members for their educational goals, with 58% of each group wanting further formal education. Stepping Stone members have better outcomes than members who have recently joined the Clubhouse. This evaluation was successful because it intentionally built evaluative capacity and empowered member-centric processes.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPsychiatric RehabilitationSocial SupportAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesClubhouse modelCommunity servicesMental healthMental illnessPsychosocial rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39821499
PMCPMC11772440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.