Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821495›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2025

Efficiency of glass ionomer sealant application in reducing hypersensitivity in MIH-molars in schoolchildren immediately and after 12 weeks.

R Karim, M Baider, C H Splieth, J Schmoeckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Restorative interventions and management of primary and permanent molars affected by molar incisor hypo-mineralization: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R KarimDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, Greifswald, Germany. ramiar.karim@stud.uni-greifswald.de.
M BaiderDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, Greifswald, Germany. mohamed.baider@uni-greifswald.de.
C H SpliethDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, Greifswald, Germany.
J SchmoeckelDepartment of Paediatric Dentistry, University Medicine Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 42a, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis prospective clinical study aimed to clinically investigate the efficiency of (GIC) glass-ionomer cement application (Ionostar Plus + Easy Glaze, VOCO) in reducing hypersensitivity in permanent molars affected by molar incisor hypomineralisation when assessed immediately (15 min) and 12 weeks after its application. MATERIALS AND

methodsChildren with at least one hypersensitive MIH-affected permanent molar (MIH-TNI-3 or 4). The pre-treatment status was evaluated and only included if they did not receive a tooth-specific in-office desensitizing treatment within one month. Clinical pain assessments were performed using the schiff score air sensitivity scale (SCASS) and Wong-baker faces Scale (WBFS).

resultsThis study involved 25 participants (mean age 8.6 ± 1.85 years) with 43 hypersensitive MIH-molars of which about half were SCASS 3 (n = 24, 55.8%) and SCASS 2 (n = 19, 44.2%). Regarding hypersensitivity, the reported mean SCASS score reduced significantly from 2.56 (± 0.50) at baseline to 1.14 (± 0.96) after 15 min of GIC sealant application and even further to 0.71 (± 0.89) after 12 weeks (P < 0.001, Paired t test). Similarly, reported WBFS scores also significantly reduced from 5.81 (± 2.50; Range = 2-10) at baseline to 2.88 (± 2.31; Range = 0-10) after 15 min and to 2.95 (± 2.17) after 12 weeks, respectively (P < 0.001, Paired t test). The mean reduction in SCASS scores was 1.3 (± 0.6) and 1.4 (± 1.0) for baseline SCASS 2 vs. 3, respectively.

conclusionGIC coverage is effective in providing clear instant relief from hypersensitivity in MIH molars in schoolchildren, which improves even further over a period of 12 weeks.

Indexed as

Dental Enamel HypoplasiaDentin SensitivityGlass Ionomer CementsMolarChildFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesGlass Ionomer CementsGlass-ionomer cementHypersensitivityMolar incisor hypomineralisationSchiff score air sensitivity scaleWong-baker faces Scale

Identifiers

PMID39821495
PMCPMC11972179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.