Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821481›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2025

Gender and sex differences in colorectal cancer screening, diagnosis and treatment.

Encarnación González-Flores, Rocio Garcia-Carbonero, Elena Élez, Eduardo Redondo-Cerezo, María José Safont, Ruth Vera García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sex Differences in Cancer Stage at Diagnosis of Nonreproductive Solid Organ Tumors in the United States, 2015 to 2022.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sex Differences in Colorectal Tumor-Associated T-cell Responses.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Quality indicators in colonoscopies performed in digestive endoscopy services in northeast Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Encarnación González-FloresDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Av. de las Fuerzas Armadas, 2, Beiro, 18014, Granada, Spain. encarnagonzalezflores@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2077-5060
Rocio Garcia-CarboneroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Imas12, Medicine Faculty, Universidad Complutense Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain.
Elena ÉlezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Eduardo Redondo-CerezoInstituto de Investigación biosanitaria.ibs.granada, Granada, Spain.
María José SafontDepartment of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia University, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain.
Ruth Vera GarcíaDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Navarra, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, IdISNA, Navarra, Spain.

Funding

Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica Non-competitive
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males have a higher incidence and mortality rate from colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with females. This review examines the reasons for these differences, including risk factors, screening participation, interpretation of screening tests, presentation and tumour types, pathophysiology (particularly the impact of sex hormones on tumour-related gene expression, microsatellite instability, micro-RNA expression, and the tumour microenvironment), and the efficacy and toxicity of treatment. Sex differences in hormones and body composition are responsible for some of the sexual dimorphism in CRC incidence and outcomes, particularly the pathophysiology, CRC presentation, the pharmacokinetics of cytotoxic therapies, and the impact of treatment on outcomes. However, gender differences also play a role, affecting risk factors, access to or participation in screening and treatment, and patients' experience of treatment (e.g. adverse events and sequelae). Sex and gender issues warrant further investigation in CRC to optimise treatment outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerSex CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsSex FactorsColorectal cancerDiagnosisGenderScreeningSexTreatment

Identifiers

PMID39821481
PMCPMC12178976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.