SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025
Feasibility of robotic surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Usefulness of Robot-assisted Surgery for Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal cancer's prevalence increases with an aging population, disproportionately affecting the elderly. The suitability of surgical interventions for this demographic is contentious due to underrepresentation during surgery. This study examines the practicality of utilizing Da Vinci surgery for rectal cancer patients who are 70 years and older. Information was gathered from PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library, with a focus on English-language publications. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4, presenting outcomes for categorical variables in risk ratios. Out of 890 patients across 5 studies, 240 were categorized as elderly, while 650 fell into the younger age group. Notable distinctions were noted in harvested lymph nodes, BMI, and postoperative outcomes, whereas factors like the length of hospital stay, Clavien-Dindo classification, and radial resection margin did not display significance. Although age increases postoperative risk, evidence emphasizes frailty, not age alone, as the primary determining factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.