ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Smartphone application-based augmented reality for pre-clinical dental implant placement training: a pilot study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Impact of Early Clinical Exposure on Competency Development in Dental Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of mixed reality training method on novice trainees of dental implants: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Influence of Controlled Lighting Conditions on Smartphone-Based Augmented Reality Recognition of a 3D-Printed Dental Model for Implantological Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrecise implant placement is essential for optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes. Digital technologies, such as computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS), have improved implant outcomes. However, conventional methods such as static and dynamic CAIS (dCAIS) require complex equipment. This study examined the usefulness of smartphone-based augmented reality (AR) for CAIS based on the value addition regarding angulation and positioning of pilot drillings and the potential for training dental students.
methodsAn in vitro model was created to mimic dental scenarios using three-dimensional datasets. Smartphone technology and AR application (app)-based intraoral tracking were used for dCAIS. The app allowed real-time visualization of implant planning, superimposition of three-dimensional models, and alignment of surgical instruments. Forty dental students performed four pilot drillings each; two were performed freehand, whereas two were performed using the app. The angulation and position of the prepared implant bed preparation were statistically analyzed.
resultsImplant angulation was significantly better in the AR-guided group than in the unguided group; however, no significant difference was observed in the implant position.
conclusionsSmartphone-based AR techniques for dCAIS are easily accessible in dental implantology. This may be advantageous for training dental students and potentially improving clinical outcomes, particularly the angulation of dental implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.