Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821422›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Manuscript publication of abstracts presented at gynecologic surgery societies' annual meetings.

Kasey C Fitzsimmons, Kacey M Hamilton, Rebecca J Schneyer, Shlomi Toussia-Cohen, Shannon Fan, Nikki R Farsa, Gabriel Levin, Kelly N Wright, Raanan Meyer

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kasey C FitzsimmonsDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kacey M HamiltonDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rebecca J SchneyerDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Shlomi Toussia-CohenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Shannon FanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nikki R FarsaUniversity of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Gabriel LevinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.
Kelly N WrightDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raanan MeyerDivision of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Raanan.Meyer@cshs.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-4343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study characteristics and identify factors associated with full manuscript publication of oral abstracts presented at gynecologic surgery societies' annual meetings. STUDY

designWe reviewed all oral abstracts presented at four major gynecologic surgery meetings in 2018. Oral abstracts subsequently published as peer-reviewed manuscripts were compared to those that were not published. Descriptive statistical analysis and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with peer-reviewed manuscript publication.

resultsA total of 396 oral presentation abstracts from the four nationally recognized gynecologic societies were identified. The overall journal publication rate was 47.4% (188/396). The rate of publication of oral abstracts was 35.1% (72/205) for those presented at AAGL, 73.8% (62/84) for AUGS, 53.2% (42/79) for SGO and 42.9% (12/28) for SGS. In multivariable regression analysis, last author's H-index [aOR 95% CI 1.02 (1.00-1.03)], academic center affiliation [aOR 95% CI 2.29 (1.20-4.37)], and randomized controlled trials [aOR 95% CI 2.47 (1.12-5.47)] were associated with journal publication. Of the published articles, the median time to publication was 3.0 years [1.0-5.0], the median journal impact factor was 3.9 [1.8-4.8], the median relative citation ratio was 1.0 [0.4-1.9], and the median number of citations per year was 2.0 [1.0-4.1].

conclusionsIn the field of gynecologic surgery, several factors, including the last researcher's H-index, academic affiliation, randomized controlled trial design and type of societal meeting are associated with increased odds of an oral abstract ultimately reaching full manuscript peer-reviewed publication. These findings can serve researchers in the fields of gynecologic surgical subspecialties.

Indexed as

Abstracting and IndexingCongresses as TopicGynecologic Surgical ProceduresPublishingFemaleGynecologyHumansPeer Review, ResearchSocieties, MedicalAbstract to full-text publicationGynecologic surgeryH-indexJournal societyObstetrics and gynecology

Identifiers

PMID39821422
PMCPMC11919985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.