Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821421›Full record

ArticleBJU international2025

Outcomes after cystectomy in Australian rural and metropolitan hospitals by intensive care admissions.

Jessica A Paynter, Zakary Doherty, Kirby R Qin, David Pilcher, Janelle Brennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica A PaynterMonash Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5888-7391
Zakary DohertyMonash Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Kirby R QinMonash Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5215-5985
David PilcherDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Janelle BrennanMonash Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine demographics and in-hospital outcomes for patients admitted to Australian intensive care units (ICUs) following cystectomy of the urinary bladder. Additionally, to compare outcomes between metropolitan and rural hospitals. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was undertaken of all adult patients admitted to participating Australian ICUs (Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database) following cystectomy/cystoprostatectomy between January 2011 and December 2021. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital length of stay.

resultsOver the 10-year period, 3376 adult patients were admitted to 135 Australian ICUs after cystectomy. Of these, 3083 patients (91.3%) were treated in 106 metropolitan ICUs and 293 patients (8.7%) were treated in 29 rural ICUs. There was no difference in adjusted mortality between metropolitan and rural hospitals admitted to an ICU after cystectomy (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 0.44-3.48; P = 0.6).

conclusionThere was no difference in in-hospital mortality for cystectomy patients requiring ICU admission between metropolitan and rural hospitals. These findings may be used to inform decisions about the rural provision of cystectomy services.

Indexed as

CystectomyHospitals, RuralHospitals, UrbanIntensive Care UnitsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAustraliabladder cancercystectomycystoprostatectomyICUnational studyradicalRural

Identifiers

PMID39821421
PMCPMC12594271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.