SynthesisIrish journal of medical science2025
Cannabis use in Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Synthesis in Irish journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis meta-analysis aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of cannabis in the management of Crohn's disease (CD) by synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). By adhering to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines and registering the study protocol with PROSPERO, this research intends to offer robust, evidence-based recommendations for healthcare practitioners on the therapeutic potential and clinical implications of cannabis use in CD management.
methodsA literature search encompassing PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify relevant RCTs comparing cannabis to placebo or standard therapy in CD patients. Inclusion criteria focused on outcomes such as remission rates, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, quality of life (QoL), and adverse events (AEs). Statistical analysis using RevMan 5.3 involved weighted mean differences (MD) and 95% confidence intervals to compare outcomes between the cannabis and control groups.
resultsThe meta-analysis revealed significant findings regarding the impact of cannabis on CD management. The cannabis group exhibited significantly higher clinical remission rates at 8 weeks compared to the control group, with low heterogeneity [MD = - 67.98; 95% CI: (- 100.68, - 35.29)]. However, a statistically significant improvement in QoL was observed in the placebo group compared to the cannabis-treated group [MD = 19.62; 95% CI (14.24 to 25.00)]. There was a non-significant lowering in serum CRP levels compared to the placebo group [MD: - 0.51; 95% CI: (- 1.05, 0.02)].
conclusionThe study concludes that cannabis shows promise as a therapeutic option for CD, demonstrating higher remission rates and potential benefits for disease management. However, it also highlights the need for larger, standardized research studies to solidify conclusions regarding efficacy, safety, and biomarker responses in CD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.