ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Short-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib combined with 308 excimer light versus upadacitinib alone and 308 excimer light alone in patients with progressing facial vitiligo.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with progressing facial vitiligo who had been treated with upadacitinib, 308 nm excimer light and upadacitinib combined with 308 nm excimer light were selected for retrospective analysis and comparison of their efficacy and safety. Efficacy was evaluated using the Vitiligo Area Severity Index (VASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at baseline, after 8 weeks, and after 20 weeks. The progression of skin lesions was monitored through reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), while adverse reactions were documented. In the combination treatment group, the average VASI at baseline was 0.875 ± 0.4111, which decreased to 0.56 ± 0.32 at week 8 and 0.23 ± 0.218 at week 20 of follow-up (F = 9.918, p = 0.001). RCM analysis indicated that cases achieving VASI100 showed restoration to normalcy regarding loss of integrity within the pigment ring in lesion areas. Although one patient experienced exacerbation of acne, this condition was manageable with topical medication. In contrast, the average VASI score in the 308 nm excimer light group prior to treatment was recorded at 0.908 ± 0.334; by week twenty, it further declined to an average of 0.495 ± 0.4196. The differences observed were statistically significant (F = 28.644, p < 0.001). For patients in the upadacitinib group, the initial average VASI score was noted as being 0.825 ± 0.34; by twenty weeks it averaged approximately 0.53 ± 0.33; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (F = 2.87, p = 0.14). The efficacy of the combined treatment group was significantly superior compared to both other groups (F = 3.927, p = 0.026). In conclusion, upadacitinib combined with308nm excimer light represents an effective therapeutic option for progressive facial vitiligo and is associated with fewer adverse reactions as well as improved quality of life for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.