SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
Heterogeneity in definitions of surgical site infection after cranial surgery limits the validity of research findings in neurosurgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Magnetic resonance imaging and the evaluation of vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2026Pooled it
- Consensus on the use of artificial intelligence in the management and measurement of vestibular schwannomas: A protocol for a modified delphi consensus.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical site infections after cranial surgery (SSI-CRAN) are serious adverse events considering the vicinity of the wound to the central nervous system. Variability in outcome definitions can hinder the ability to produce reliable evidence. This systematic review aimed to investigate whether there is variation in SSI-CRAN definitions across studies and its impact on the identification of effective treatments for patients after cranial surgery. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central were undertaken. Studies that reported data about SSI-CRAN were included. Our final dataset consisted of 519 studies reporting SSI-CRAN. Subspecialties included were neuro-oncology (n = 103,19.8%), neurotrauma (n = 92,17.7%), paediatric neurosurgery (n = 56,10.8%), functional neurosurgery (n = 52,10.0%), neurovascular (n = 38,7.3%), skull base (n = 37,7.1%), cerebrospinal fluid dynamics (n = 11,2.1%), and general neurosurgical cases (n = 149,28.7%). A hundred and sixty-nine (32.6%) studies reported SSI-CRAN definitions. Twenty-six different indicators for SSI-CRAN were used, with a median of nine (range: one to 16) utilised per study. Only 21 (4.0%) studies considered the varying definitions of SSI-CRAN in their conclusions, indicating that a lack of consistent definitions across studies impacted the ability to draw clear conclusions. There are discrepancies in the definition of SSI-CRAN across the literature. This heterogeneity has hindered the ability to draw conclusions about the effects of interventions, with only 4.0% of authors accounting for this in their findings. It is important to be cautious when reviewing studies that report SSI-CRAN outcomes without acknowledging this heterogeneity, as the validity of their reported evidence may be limited. The implementation of a new core indicator set could support uniform reporting of indicators along with regulation of reported SSI-CRAN outcomes, thereby facilitating more effective evidence synthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.