Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821364›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Robotic hiatus hernia surgery: learning curve and lessons learned.

Elisenda Garsot, Georgina Company-Se, Arantxa Clavell, Marta Viciano, Christian Herrero, Lexa Nescolarde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisenda GarsotDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08913, Barcelona, Spain. 1172052@uab.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3132-4756
Georgina Company-SeElectronic and Biomedical Instrumentation Group, Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, C/ Jordi Girona, 1-3, Edifici C4, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.
Arantxa ClavellDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08913, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta VicianoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08913, Barcelona, Spain.
Christian HerreroDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08913, Barcelona, Spain.
Lexa NescolardeElectronic and Biomedical Instrumentation Group, Department of Electronic Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, C/ Jordi Girona, 1-3, Edifici C4, 08034, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New procedures like the robotic approach require proficiency to ensure patient safety and satisfactory functional results. Hiatal hernia surgery serves as a suitable training procedure for upper gastrointestinal tract surgeons transitioning to the robotic approach. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of implementing the robotic approach in hiatal hernia surgery at a tertiary hospital and to assess the associated learning curve. A retrospective review was conducted on 54 patients (58 surgeries) between June 2019 and March 2024, including both primary and revision robotic antireflux surgeries. The study focused on perioperative outcomes, symptom resolution, and the surgical learning curve, assessed using Cumulative Sum analysis. The results showed that global surgical time averaged 124 ± 57 (54-350) min, 127 ± 38 (116-139) for Primary Surgery and 164 ± 84 (115-212) min for Revisional Surgery. There were no conversions to laparoscopic or open approach. The global median of hospital stay was 2 days (2 for Primary Surgery and 3 for Revisional Surgery) and three patients required readmission (2 for Primary Surgery and 1 for Revisional Surgery). Postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients. Symptom resolution was achieved in 90% of Primary Surgery group and 85.7% of Revisional Surgery group. Learning curve described three phases: 1-training (case 1 to 14), 2-plateau (15 to 25) and 3-expertise phase (25 onwards). The robotic approach in hiatal hernia surgery is feasible with minimal morbidity, short hospital stays, and excellent functional results. With previous experience in laparoscopic approach and esophagogastric surgery the learning curve can be reduced to 14 procedures.

Indexed as

Hernia, HiatalHerniorrhaphyLearning CurveRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHiatal herniaLearning curveRevisional surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39821364
PMCPMC11742325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.