ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2025
Is it worth paying attention to actinedid mites in agricultural fields?
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural management increases the seasonal dynamics of soil-dwelling organisms compared to natural habitats. Our knowledge is very poor about the relationship between seasonal changes of soil microorganisms and the microbivorous soil arthropods. To reveal these connections, we have to know more about the seasonal changes of soil-dwelling microarthropods in croplands. Actinedid mites are rarely the subject of synecological studies, however, this group regularly reaches the dominant part of mite assemblages in agro-ecosystems. In this study, we investigated the seasonal density changes of actinedid mites from two independent studies of agricultural fields. Soil samples were taken from maize and wheat fields for two years, and from newly established meadows for one year in summer and autumn in Hungary. Soil-dwelling mites were enumerated and identified at the suborder level and soil parameters were measured. Actinedid mites dominated most of our soil samples. The density of Endeostigmata was the highest in the summer and the density of Heterostigmata was the highest in the autumn within one year among different crop species, soil types, and years. Endeostigmatid mites had negative relationships with soil nitrogen parameters and positive with soil moisture. Heterostigmatid mites had various relationships with soil moisture. The ecology of actinedid mites is under-examined but their high number in agricultural fields may justify the fact that they should receive more attention. We assume that Actinedida, mainly Endeostigmata and Heterostigmata are worth to investigate in croplands as a starting point to reveal the connection between the seasonality of soil mites and soil microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.