Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821331›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Comparison of different characterization approaches for monoelemental calibration solutions at two national metrology institutes.

Murat Tunç, Cristhian Paredes, F Gonca Coşkun, Juliana Serna, Merve Caner

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Murat TunçTÜBİTAK-UME National Metrology Institute, Gebze Yerleşkesi Barış Mah. Dr. Zeki Acar Cad. No:1, 41470, Gebze, Kocaeli, Türkiye. tunc.murat@tubitak.gov.tr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-8641
Cristhian ParedesGrupo de Investigación en Metrología Química y Bioanálisis, Instituto Nacional de Metrología de Colombia, Ak. 50 26 - 55 Int. 2, Bogotá, 111321, Colombia.
F Gonca CoşkunTÜBİTAK-UME National Metrology Institute, Gebze Yerleşkesi Barış Mah. Dr. Zeki Acar Cad. No:1, 41470, Gebze, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Juliana SernaGrupo de Investigación en Metrología Química y Bioanálisis, Instituto Nacional de Metrología de Colombia, Ak. 50 26 - 55 Int. 2, Bogotá, 111321, Colombia.
Merve CanerTurkish Petroleum Refineries Co. TÜPRAŞ R&D Center, Körfez, Kocaeli, 41790, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoelemental calibration solutions are the most common reference in elemental analysis, linking measurement results to the International System of Units (SI). National Metrology Institutes (NMI) prepare these solutions as certified reference materials (CRM) and determine their elemental mass fraction with high accuracy. Characterization with high accuracy is one of the most critical steps in CRM production. This report compares the approaches taken by the NMIs of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK-UME) and Colombia (INM(CO)) in preparing and characterizing cadmium calibration solutions with a nominal value of 1 g kg

Indexed as

Certified reference materialCharacterizationElemental analysisGravimetric titrationMonoelemental calibration solutionsPrimary difference method

Identifiers

PMID39821331
PMCPMC12003560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.