Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821214›Full record

ArticleAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2025

Ultra-Fast Moisture Sensor for Respiratory Cycle Monitoring and Non-Contact Sensing Applications.

Suman Mandal, Harold Mazo Mantilla, Kalaivanan Loganathan, Hendrik Faber, Abhinav Sharma, Murali Gedda, Emre Yengel, Dipak Kumar Goswami, Martin Heeney, Thomas D Anthopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suman MandalPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7445-6818
Harold Mazo MantillaPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Kalaivanan LoganathanPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-1935
Hendrik FaberPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-2365
Abhinav SharmaPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-8749
Murali GeddaPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-6623
Emre YengelPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.
Dipak Kumar GoswamiOrganic Electronics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, 721302, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5891-6172
Martin HeeneyPhysical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6879-5020
Thomas D AnthopoulosHenry Royce Institute and Photon Science Institute, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-8813

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India JNC/KEK-JAP/IN-36King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As human-machine interface hardware advances, better sensors are required to detect signals from different stimuli. Among numerous technologies, humidity sensors are critical for applications across different sectors, including environmental monitoring, food production, agriculture, and healthcare. Current humidity sensors rely on materials that absorb moisture, which can take some time to equilibrate with the surrounding environment, thus slowing their temporal response and limiting their applications. Here, this challenge is tackled by combining a nanogap electrode (NGE) architecture with chicked egg-derived albumen as the moisture-absorbing component. The sensors offer inexpensive manufacturing, high responsivity, ultra-fast response, and selectivity to humidity within a relative humidity range of 10-70% RH. Specifically, the egg albumen-based sensor showed negligible response to relevant interfering species and remained specific to water moisture with a room-temperature responsivity of 1.15 × 10

Indexed as

HumidityRespirationAnimalsElectrodesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicWaterWateralbumenbiopolymershealthcare sensorshuman‐machine interfaceshumidity sensorsnanogapsnon‐contact switches

Identifiers

PMID39821214
PMCPMC11854870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.