Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821182›Full record

ArticleDrugs in R&D2025

Characterization for the Similarity Assessment Between the Proposed Biosimilar SB17 and Ustekinumab Reference Product Using State-of-the-Art Analytical Methods.

Sung-Yong Yang, Changsoo Lee, Keumbi Hwang, Jungmin Lee, Jaell Lee, Juyong Hong, Seongyoung Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs in R&D, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sung-Yong Yang *Quality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Changsoo Lee *Quality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Keumbi HwangQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Jungmin LeeQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Jaell LeeQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea.
Juyong HongQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea. juyong.hong@samsung.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2109-0397
Seongyoung JungQuality Evaluation Team, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, South Korea. seongyoung.jung@samsung.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSB17 is being developed as a biosimilar to ustekinumab reference product (RP), a human monoclonal antibody (IgG1 kappa immunoglobulin) that binds to the common p40 subunit of cytokines interleukin (IL)-23 and IL-12. Binding to this subunit prevents interaction with their receptor, resulting in modulation in the immune system responses that play a key role in inflammatory disease.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate structural, physicochemical, and biological similarity between ustekinumab RP and SB17 using various state-of-the-art analytical methods.

methodsComprehensive analytical characterization was conducted by the quality range and side-by-side comparison approach for SB17 versus the European Union (EU) and US ustekinumab RP using various analytical methods. Comparisons included purity, product-related impurity, charge heterogeneity, primary structure, posttranslational modification, higher-order structure, quantity, Fab-related biological activities (potency and binding activity), and Fc-related biological activities.

resultsOn the basis of the analytical similarity assessment, the structural, physicochemical, and biological characterization results demonstrated that SB17 is comparable to the ustekinumab RP. In the structural aspects, it was confirmed that there is no clinically meaningful difference between posttranslational modification profiles and higher-order structures of SB17 compared with the ustekinumab RP. Product-related impurities in the form of aggregates were also confirmed to be similar. SB17 has lower acidic and basic variants compared with ustekinumab RP, owing to the difference in the producing cell line. Ustekinumab RP is expressed in an Sp2/0 cell line, whereas SB17 is expressed in CHO cell line. However, the difference between SB17 and ustekinumab RP in the charge variants is not considered to be clinically meaningful, since equivalent biological activity was observed. In the case of mechanism of action (MoA)-related biological activities, SB17 is highly similar to the EU and US ustekinumab RP with respect to overall critical and noncritical quality attributes analyzed. Moreover, similarity or lack of activity in Fc-related biological activities was also confirmed. On the basis of these results, SB17 is expected to have comparable safety and efficacy as compared with ustekinumab RP.

conclusionIn summary, the overall analytical characterization and similarity assessment results show that SB17 is comparable to the EU and US ustekinumab RP in terms of structural, physicochemical, biophysical, and biological attributes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsUstekinumabEuropean UnionHumansAntibodies, MonoclonalBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID39821182
PMCPMC12011669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.