Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821147›Full record

ReviewEpilepsia2025

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in patients under intensive care: Should we view epilepsy as a sleep disorder?

Philippe Gélisse, Arielle Crespel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Philippe GélisseEpilepsy Unit, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-1957
Arielle CrespelEpilepsy Unit, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-1938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) was initially described in patients with typical and atypical absence status epilepticus (ASE) characterized by states of confusion varying in severity and in focal epilepsies with or without alteration of consciousness. Continuous EEG monitoring of critically ill patients has further refined the classification of NCSE into two main categories: with coma and without coma. Hypnotic, soporific or somniferous epileptic seizures do not exist. On the contrary, patients usually awaken when seizures occur during sleep, and their eyes remain open during ASE. Excessive sleepiness and coma alone are not ictal signs but are observed in the postictal phase of convulsive seizures. On the other hand, excessive sleepiness evolving into coma is a cardinal sign of metabolic/toxic encephalopathies with triphasic waves evolving to burst suppression patterns and ultimately to cerebral inactivity and death. NCSE alone does not directly cause coma. Comas are related to the underlying etiology, patient age and comorbidities, as well as the administration of intravenous sedative drugs to control epileptic seizures. In cases of severe brain injury, NCSE can explain the failure to awaken after the withdrawal of anesthetics and is only an aggravating factor of the neurological condition. In typical ASE, which is characterized by sustained, rhythmic, bilateral, synchronous and unreactive discharges with evolving spatiotemporal patterns (the best example of NCSE), there is no vigilance impairment. This contrasts with metabolic/toxic encephalopathies, which exhibit monomorphic generalized periodic discharges in which patients may become comatose and die. The extended concept of NCSE in comatose patients may lead to an inflated assessment of NCSE, implying a potentially worse prognosis compared to convulsive status epilepticus.

Indexed as

Critical CareSleep Wake DisordersStatus EpilepticusComaElectroencephalographyHumanscomaencephalopathyperiodic dischargesrhythmic dischargestriphasic waves

Identifiers

PMID39821147
PMCPMC11997921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.