Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821060›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025

Quality and Regulatory Requirements for the Manufacture of Master Cell Banks of Clinical Grade iPSCs: The EU and USA Perspectives.

Fernando Martins, Maria H L Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The role of stem cells in precision medicine: next-generation cancer treatment.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fernando MartinsFaculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria H L RibeiroFaculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003, Lisboa, Portugal. mhribeiro@ff.ulisboa.pt.ORCID 0000-0001-5693-7861

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/DTP/04138/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and protocols for their differentiation into various cell types have revolutionized the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Developing manufacturing guidelines for safe and GMP-compliant final products has become essential. Allogeneic iPSCs-derived cell therapies are now the preferred manufacturing alternative. This option requires the establishment of clinical-grade master cell banks of iPSCs. This study aimed at reviewing the Quality and Regulatory requirements from the two main authorities in the world-Europe (EMA) and the United States (FDA)-regarding the manufacture of clinical grade master cell banks (iPSCs). The minimum requirements for iPSCs to be used in first-in-human clinical trials were also reviewed, as well as current best practices currently followed by iPSC bank manufacturers for final product characterisation. The methodology used for this work was a review of various sources of information ranging from scientific literature, published guidance documents available on the EMA and FDA websites, GMP and ICH guidelines, and applicable compendial monographs. Manufacturers of iPSCs cell banks looking to qualify them for clinical use are turning to the ICH guidelines and trying to adapt their requirements. Specifically with the impact of the field of iPSC cell banks, the following areas should be subject to guidance and harmonisation: i) expression vectors authorized for iPSC generation; ii) minimum identity testing; iii) minimum purity testing (including adventitious agent testing); and iv) stability testing. Current ICH guidelines for biotechnological/biological products should be extended to cover cell banks used for cell therapies.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsCell DifferentiationEuropean UnionHumansQuality ControlRegenerative MedicineUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationClinical gradeInduced pluripotent stem cellsiPSCsManufactureMaster cell banksQuality requirementsRegulatory requirements

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.