Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821053›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2025

Representation Quotients to Examine Diversity in Ophthalmology Residency Applicants and Matriculants.

Saba S Paracha, Shani A Williams, Alizeh Shamshad, Elijah M Persad-Paisley, Michael E Migliori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saba S ParachaWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Shani A WilliamsWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Alizeh ShamshadWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Elijah M Persad-PaisleyWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Michael E MiglioriDivision of Ophthalmology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A diverse ophthalmic workforce is key to equitable care, and identifying areas of underrepresentation is important in tackling vision care disparities. Objective: To evaluate the diversity of applicants and matriculants in ophthalmology residency programs relative to medical school graduates and analyze the intersection of race and gender within this pathway. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from 2022 to 2024 used representation quotients (RQs) using reports from the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology and San Francisco Match, along with demographic data from the Association of American Medical Colleges from 2008 to 2021. RQs measure equity by dividing a racial, ethnic, or gender group's proportion in a specific population by its proportion in a larger reference population. Individuals who graduated from US medical schools from 2008 to 2021 or who applied to or matriculated into US ophthalmology residency programs from 2015 to 2021 and from 2008 to 2021, respectively, were eligible for inclusion. Exposure: Applying to or matriculating into ophthalmology residency. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was median RQs and trends among racial, ethnic, and gender groups for ophthalmology applicants (RQapp) and matriculants (RQmat), with RQ differences evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Among total applicants (n = 5304) and matriculants (n = 6139), 36% and 42% of applicants and matriculants, respectively, were female (applicants: 28% Asian, 4% Black, 7% Hispanic, and 47% White; matriculants: 31% Asian, 3% Black, 5% Hispanic, and 57% White). Self-identified Black individuals had the lowest median (IQR) RQs (RQapp, 0.604 [0.437-0.771]; RQmat, 0.469 [0.341-0.597]). Regression analysis revealed increased representation for male applicants (slope, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.015-0.057; P = .007) and matriculants (slope, 0.009; 95% CI, 0.002-0.016; P = .02), but decreased representation for female applicants (slope, -0.031; 95% CI, -0.010 to -0.102; P = .01) and matriculants (slope, -0.009; 95% CI, -0.016 to -0.002; P = .02). Black (RQapp, 0.604 vs RQmat, 0.469; P = .047) and Hispanic (RQapp, 1.46 vs RQmat, 1.04; P = .03) groups experienced a decrease between applicant and matriculants. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional retrospective study found persistent underrepresentation of Black and female individuals in ophthalmology residency programs, with increases in Black and Hispanic applicants failing to translate into higher matriculation rates. Barriers that female or Black medical students face when applying or matriculating into ophthalmology residency may contribute to their underrepresentation in the field.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityEducation, Medical, GraduateEthnicityInternship and ResidencyOphthalmologyStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39821053
PMCPMC11843372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.