Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821042›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025

Critically ill adult patients with acute leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dara Chean, David Luque-Paz, Daniele Poole, Sofiane Fodil, Etienne Lengliné, Thibault Dupont, Achille Kouatchet, Michael Darmon, Élie Azoulay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dara CheanMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris University, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, 75010, France. dara.chean@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-7617-4220
David Luque-PazInfectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Daniele PooleEuropean Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Methodology Group, Anderlecht, Belgium.
Sofiane FodilMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris University, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, 75010, France.
Etienne LenglinéHematology Department, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris, France.
Thibault DupontMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris University, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, 75010, France.
Achille KouatchetMedical Intensive Care Unit, Angers Teaching Hospital, Angers, France.
Michael DarmonMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris University, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, 75010, France.
Élie AzoulayMedical Intensive Care Unit, Saint-Louis Teaching Hospital, Paris University, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, Paris, 75010, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo describe the use of life-sustaining therapies and mortality in patients with acute leukemia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsThe PubMed database was searched from January 1st, 2000 to July 1st, 2023. All studies including adult critically ill patients with acute leukemia were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, assessed bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies, and performed data extraction from full-text reading. We performed a proportional meta-analysis using a random effects model. The primary outcome was all-cause ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes included reasons for ICU admission, use of organ support therapies (mechanical ventilation, vasopressors and renal replacement therapy), hospital, day-90 and one-year mortality rates.

resultsOf the 1,331 studies screened, 136 (24,861 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Acute myeloid leukemia affected 16,269 (66%) patients, acute lymphoblastic leukemia affected 835 (3%) patients, and the type of leukemia was not specified in 7,757 (31%) patients. Acute respiratory failure (70%) and acute circulatory failure (25%) were the main reasons for ICU admission. Invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressors and renal replacement therapy, were needed in 65%, 53%, and 23% of the patients, respectively. ICU mortality was available in 51 studies (6,668 patients, of whom 2,956 died throughout their ICU stay), resulting in a metanalytical proportion of 52% (95% CI [47%; 57%]; I

conclusionAcute respiratory failure is the main reason for ICU admission in patients with acute leukemia. Mechanical ventilation is the first life-sustaining therapy to be used, and also a strong predictor of mortality.

trial registrationThis study's protocol was preregistered on PROSPERO (CRD42023439630).

Indexed as

Acute lymphoblastic leukemiaAcute myeloid leukemiaAcute respiratory failureHematological malignanciesIntensive care unitMeta-analysisSystematical review

Identifiers

PMID39821042
PMCPMC11739448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.