Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821027›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Classification of Breast Cancer Through the Perspective of Cell Identity Models.

Richard Iggo, Gaetan MacGrogan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard IggoINSERM, Bergonie Cancer Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Richard.Iggo@u-bordeaux.fr.
Gaetan MacGroganINSERM, Bergonie Cancer Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammary epithelium has an inner luminal layer that contains estrogen receptor (ER)-positive hormone-sensing cells and ER-negative alveolar/secretory cells, and an outer basal layer that contains myoepithelial/stem cells. Most human tumours resemble either hormone-sensing cells or alveolar/secretory cells. The most widely used molecular classification, the Intrinsic classification, assigns hormone-sensing tumours to Luminal A/B and human epidermal growth factor 2-enriched (HER2E)/molecular apocrine (MA)/luminal androgen receptor (LAR)-positive classes, and alveolar/secretory tumours to the Basal-like class. Molecular classification is most useful when tumours have classic invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) histology. It is less useful for special histological types of breast cancer, such as metaplastic breast cancer and adenoid cystic cancer, which are better described with standard pathology terms. Compared to mice, humans show a strong bias towards making tumours that resemble mammary hormone-sensing cells. This could be caused by the formation in adolescence of der(1;16), a translocation through the centromeres of chromosomes 1 and 16, which only occurs in humans and could trap the cells in the hormone-sensing state.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsFemaleHumansMiceReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, EstrogenBasal-like breast cancerBreast cancer cell of originder(1;16) translocationHER2-enriched breast cancerLuminal AR breast cancerMammary lineageMolecular apocrine breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.