Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821023›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Patient-Derived Xenografts of Breast Cancer.

Elisabetta Marangoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elisabetta MarangoniLaboratory of Preclinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France. elisabetta.marangoni@curie.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of breast cancer, obtained from the engraftment of tumour samples into immunodeficient mice, are the most effective preclinical models for studying the biology of human breast cancer and for the evaluation of new anti-cancer treatments. Notably, breast cancer PDX preserve the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of the donor tumours and reproduce the diversity of breast cancer. This preservation of breast cancer biology involves a number of different aspects, including tumour architecture and morphology, patterns of genomic alterations and gene expression, mutational status, and intra-tumour heterogeneity. For these reasons, these models have a strong predictive value in the translation of cancer therapeutics into clinical settings and can be considered as powerful and clinically relevant research tools for the identification of new treatments, mechanisms of drug resistance, and predictive biomarkers. PDX models have also been successfully used to analyse breast cancer metastasis and persister cancer cells surviving chemotherapy. Limitations of breast cancer PDX include the lack of a human immune system and the low take rate, especially for estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2-positive subtypes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceBreast cancerDrug resistanceDrug responsePDXPredictive biomarker

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.