ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Patient-Derived Xenografts of Breast Cancer.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Biochemical alterations in endocrine and inflammatory pathways following breast cancer surgery: Laboratory evidence and clinical implications.Journal of medical biochemistry · 2026Article
- Mutant p53 Directs PARP to Regulate Replication Stress and Drive Breast Cancer Metastasis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for prognosis of bone metastatic disease in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective study in the SEER database and China cohort.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of breast cancer, obtained from the engraftment of tumour samples into immunodeficient mice, are the most effective preclinical models for studying the biology of human breast cancer and for the evaluation of new anti-cancer treatments. Notably, breast cancer PDX preserve the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of the donor tumours and reproduce the diversity of breast cancer. This preservation of breast cancer biology involves a number of different aspects, including tumour architecture and morphology, patterns of genomic alterations and gene expression, mutational status, and intra-tumour heterogeneity. For these reasons, these models have a strong predictive value in the translation of cancer therapeutics into clinical settings and can be considered as powerful and clinically relevant research tools for the identification of new treatments, mechanisms of drug resistance, and predictive biomarkers. PDX models have also been successfully used to analyse breast cancer metastasis and persister cancer cells surviving chemotherapy. Limitations of breast cancer PDX include the lack of a human immune system and the low take rate, especially for estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2-positive subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.