ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
GWAS-assisted and multitrait genomic prediction for improvement of seed yield and canning quality traits in a black bean breeding panel.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic Selection for Cashmere Traits in Inner Mongolian Cashmere Goats Using Random Forest, Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, Extreme Gradient Boosting and Light Gradient Boosting Machine Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Mendelian randomization analysis of immune cell characteristics and genetic variants in cervical cancer risk: a genome-wide association study.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Mendelian randomization reveals limited causal effects of genetic variants on cervical cancer risk: insights from immune cell populations.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Advances in multi-trait genomic prediction approaches: classification, comparative analysis, and perspectives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) have gained popularity in the United States, with improved seed yield and canning quality being critical traits for new cultivars. Achieving genetic gains in these traits is often challenging due to negative trait associations and the need for specialized equipment and trained sensory panels for evaluation. This study investigates the integration of genomics and phenomics to enhance selection accuracy for these complex traits. We evaluated the prediction accuracy of single-trait (ST) and multitrait (MT) genomic prediction (GP) models, incorporating near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) data and markers identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The models demonstrated moderate prediction accuracies for yield and canning appearance (App) and high accuracies for color retention. No significant differences were found between ST and MT models within the same breeding cycle. However, across breeding cycles, MT models outperformed ST models by up to 45 and 63% for canning App and seed yield, respectively. Interestingly, incorporating significant SNP markers identified by GWAS and NIRS data into the models tended to decrease prediction accuracy both within and between breeding cycles. As genotypes from the new breeding cycle were included, the models' prediction accuracy generally increased. Our findings underscore the potential of MT models to enhance the prediction of complex traits such as seed yield and canning quality in dry beans and highlight the importance of continually updating the training dataset for effective GP implementation in dry bean breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.