Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39821011›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2025

Automated proximal coronary artery calcium identification using artificial intelligence: advancing cardiovascular risk assessment.

Jianhang Zhou, Aakash D Shanbhag, Donghee Han, Anna M Marcinkiewicz, Mikolaj Buchwald, Robert J H Miller, Aditya Killekar, Nipun Manral, Kajetan Grodecki, Jolien Geers and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jianhang ZhouDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Aakash D ShanbhagDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Donghee HanDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Anna M MarcinkiewiczDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Mikolaj BuchwaldDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Robert J H MillerDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Aditya KillekarDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Nipun ManralDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Kajetan GrodeckiDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Jolien GeersDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Konrad PieszkoDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Jirong YiDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Wenhao ZhangDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Parker WaechterDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Heidi GransarDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4704-8290
Damini DeyDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2236-6970
Daniel S BermanDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
Piotr J SlomkaDepartments of Medicine (Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine), Biomedical Sciences, and Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 6500 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-938X

Funding

Patient-specific Outcome Prediction from Cardiovascular Multimodality Imaging by Artificial IntelligenceR35HL161195 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI Piotr J Slomka · 2022 to 2026
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R35 HL161195NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsIdentification of proximal coronary artery calcium (CAC) may improve prediction of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) beyond the CAC score, particularly in patients with low CAC burden. We investigated whether the proximal CAC can be detected on gated cardiac CT and whether it provides prognostic significance with artificial intelligence (AI). METHODS AND

resultsA total of 2016 asymptomatic adults with baseline CAC CT scans from a single site were followed up for MACE for 14 years. An AI algorithm to classify CAC into proximal or not was created using expert annotations of total and proximal CAC and AI-derived cardiac structures. The algorithm was evaluated for prognostic significance on AI-derived CAC segmentation. In 303 subjects with expert annotations, the classification of proximal vs. non-proximal CAC reached an area under receiver operating curve of 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91-0.95]. For prognostic evaluation, in an additional 588 subjects with mild AI-derived CAC scores (CAC score 1-99), the AI proximal involvement was associated with worse MACE-free survival (P = 0.008) and higher risk of MACE when adjusting for CAC score alone [hazard ratio (HR) 2.28, 95% CI 1.16-4.48, P = 0.02] or CAC score and clinical risk factors (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.03-4.36, P = 0.04).

conclusionThe AI algorithm could identify proximal CAC on CAC CT. The proximal location had modest prognostic significance in subjects with mild CAC scores. The AI identification of proximal CAC can be integrated into automatic CAC scoring and improves the risk prediction of CAC CT.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseTomography, X-Ray ComputedVascular CalcificationAgedAlgorithmsCoronary AngiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentartificial intelligencecomputed tomographycoronary artery calcificationcoronary artery disease

Identifiers

PMID39821011
PMCPMC11879235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.