ArticleInternational journal of hematology2025
Post-transplant TKIs for Ph+ ALL: practices to date and clinical significance.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-transplant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show promise in preventing relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL). However, their real-world use and efficacy remain unclear. A comprehensive study across seven centers included Ph+ALL patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2002 and 2022. Post-transplant TKIs were administered in 28% of patients (49 of 173 transplanted in complete remission): 7% as prophylaxis during complete molecular remission (CMR), and 21% in response to measurable residual disease (MRD) positivity. Median first post-transplant TKI duration was 13.7 months for the prophylactic group and 4.0 months for the MRD-triggered group. Prophylactic TKIs appear particularly beneficial for patients not in CMR at allo-HCT, showing a trend towards higher 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) compared to those not receiving prophylactic TKIs (100% vs. 73%; P = 0.11). Significant RFS differences were observed between the prophylactic, non-TKI, and MRD-triggered groups. However, patients with white blood cell counts <15000/µl at diagnosis and no additional chromosomal abnormalities-an MRD-triggered high efficacy cluster-demonstrated comparable 5-year RFS regardless of TKI strategy (100% vs. 85% vs. 80%; P = 0.87). This cluster highlights the potential effectiveness of MRD-triggered TKI administration in select low-risk patients, suggesting tailored TKI strategies based on risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39821010What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.