Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820960›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering and regenerative medicine2025

Biofabricated 3D Intestinal Models as an Alternative to Animal-Based Approaches for Drug Toxicity Assays.

Larissa Bueno Tofani, Thayná Mendonça Avelino, Rafael Júnior de Azevedo, Giovanna Blazutti Elias, Melissa Dibbernn Ganzerla, Maiara Ferreira Terra, Vanessa Kiraly Thomaz Rodrigues, Renata Santos Rabelo, Samarah Vargas Harb, Ana Carolina Migliorini Figueira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Larissa Bueno TofaniBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Thayná Mendonça AvelinoBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Rafael Júnior de AzevedoBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Giovanna Blazutti EliasBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Melissa Dibbernn GanzerlaBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Maiara Ferreira TerraBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Vanessa Kiraly Thomaz RodriguesBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Renata Santos RabeloBrazilian Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil.
Samarah Vargas HarbBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil. samarah.harb@lnbio.cnpem.br.
Ana Carolina Migliorini FigueiraBiosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Sao Paulo, 13083-100, Brazil. ana.figueira@lnbio.cnpem.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7023-8490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main challenge in new drug development is accurately predicting the human response in preclinical models.

methodsIn this study, we developed three different intestinal barrier models using advanced biofabrication techniques: (i) a manual model containing Caco-2 and HT-29 cells on a collagen bed, (ii) a manual model with a Caco-2/HT-29 layer on a HDFn-laden collagen layer, and (iii) a 3D bioprinted model incorporating both cellular layers. Each model was rigorously tested for its ability to simulate a functional intestinal membrane.

resultsAll models successfully replicated the structural and functional aspects of the intestinal barrier. The 3D bioprinted intestinal model, however, demonstrated superior epithelial barrier integrity enhanced tight junction formation, microvilli development, and increased mucus production. When subjected to Ibuprofen, the 3D bioprinted model provided a more predictive response, underscoring its potential as a reliable in vitro tool for drug toxicity testing.

conclusionOur 3D bioprinted intestinal model presents a robust and predictive platform for drug toxicity assessments, significantly reducing the need for animal testing. This model not only aligns with ethical testing protocols but also offers enhanced accuracy in predicting human responses, thereby advancing the field of drug development.

Indexed as

Animal Testing AlternativesIntestinal MucosaIntestinesModels, BiologicalPrinting, Three-DimensionalToxicity TestsAnimalsBioprintingCaco-2 CellsHT29 CellsHumansIbuprofenIbuprofen3D bioprinting3D cell cultureAlternative animal methodsBiofabricationIntestinal barrier

Identifiers

PMID39820960
PMCPMC11794730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.