ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Automatic positioning of cutting planes for bone tumor resection surgery.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In bone tumor resection surgery, patient-specific cutting guides aid the surgeon in the resection of a precise part of the bone. Despite the use of automation methodologies in surgical guide modeling, to date, the placement of cutting planes is a manual task. This work presents an algorithm for the automatic positioning of cutting planes to reduce healthy bone resected and thus improve post-operative outcomes. The algorithm uses particle swarm optimization to search for the optimal positioning of points defining a cutting surface composed of planes parallel to a surgical approach direction. The quality of a cutting surface is evaluated by an objective function that considers two key variables: the volumes of healthy bone resected and tumor removed. The algorithm was tested on three tumor cases in long bone epiphyses (two tibial, one humeral) with varying plane numbers. Optimal optimization parameters were determined, with varying parameters through iterations providing lower mean and standard deviation of the objective function. Initializing particle swarm optimization with a plausible cutting surface configuration further improved stability and minimized healthy bone resection. Future work is required to reach 3D optimization of the planes positioning, further improving the solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.