ArticleInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology2025
Differences of microbial growth and biofilm formation among periprosthetic joint infection-causing species: an animal study.
Article in International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe most frequently used surgical procedures for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), as well as single- or two-stage revision arthroplasty. The choice of surgery is made depending on the full maturation of the biofilm layer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biofilm formation and microbial growth using common PJI-causing agents and compare its development on the implant surface.
methodsThe in vivo study was performed using 40 Sprague-Dawley rats divided into five groups (n = 8/group): Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, and control. Six standard titanium alloy discs were placed into the subcutaneous air pouches of the interscapular areas of the rats. After the inoculation of microorganisms, disc and soft tissue cultures were collected at 2-week intervals for 6 weeks, and the microbial load and the microscopic appearance of the biofilm were compared.
resultsThe disc samples from the S. aureus group had the highest infection load at all time points; however, in soft tissue samples, this was only observed at week 4 and 6. Electron microscopic images showed no distinctive differences in the biofilm structures between the groups.
conclusionS. aureus microbial burden was significantly higher in implant cultures at week 2 compared to other PJI-causing agents examined. These results may explain the higher failure rate seen if the DAIR procedure was performed at < 3-4 weeks after the PJI symptom onset and support the observation that DAIR may not be effective against PJIs caused by S. aureus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39820867What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.