Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820788›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

The CASPAR study protocol. Can cervical stiffness predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labour? a feasibility, cohort study.

Elizabeth Medford, Steven Lane, Abi Merriel, Andrew Sharp, Angharad Care

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05981469 (Can Cervical Stiffness Predict Successful Vaginal Delivery After Induction of Labour?), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05981469 completednot on this map

Can Cervical Stiffness Predict Successful Vaginal Delivery After Induction of Labour?

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of LiverpoolRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsInduced Vaginal DeliveryArmsCervical Stiffness Assessmenr, Bishop's Score Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth MedfordDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-4578-0446
Steven LaneUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Abi MerrielLiverpool Women's Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Andrew SharpDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Angharad CareDepartment of Women and Children's Health, Harris Preterm Birth Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2131-0406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduction of labour (IOL) is a common obstetric intervention in the UK, affecting up to 33% of deliveries. IOL aims to achieve a vaginal delivery prior to spontaneous onset of labour to prevent harm from ongoing pregnancy complications and is known to prevent stillbirths and reduce neonatal intensive care unit admissions. However, IOL doesn't come without risk and overall, 20% of mothers having an induction will still require a caesarean section birth and in primiparous mothers this rate is even higher. There is no reliable predictive bedside tool available in clinical practice to predict which patient's undergoing the IOL process will result in a vaginal birth; the fundamental aim of the IOL process. The Bishop's Score (BS) remains in routine clinical practice as the examination tool to assess the cervix prior to IOL, despite it being proven to be ineffective as a predictive tool and largely subjective. This study will assess the use of the Pregnolia System, a new objective antenatal test of cervical stiffness. This study will explore its' potential for pre-induction cervical assessment and indication of delivery outcome following IOL.

methodsCASPAR is a feasibility study of term, primiparous women with singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL. Cervical stiffness will be assessed using the Pregnolia System; a novel, non-invasive, licensed, CE-marked, aspiration-based device proven to provide objective, quantitative cervical stiffness measurements represented as the Cervical Stiffness Index (CSI, in mbar). A measurement is obtained by applying the sterile single-use Pregnolia Probe directly to the anterior lip of the cervix, visualised via placement of a speculum. Following informed consent, CASPAR study participants will undergo the Pregnolia System cervical stiffness assessment prior to their IOL process commencing. Participant questionnaires will evaluate the acceptability of this assessment tool in this population. This study will directly compare this novel antenatal test to the current BS for both patient experience of the different cervical assessment tools and for IOL outcome prediction. DISCUSSION: This feasibility study will explore the use of this novel device in clinical practice for pre-induction cervical assessment and delivery outcome prediction. Our findings will provide novel data that could be instrumental in transforming clinical practice surrounding IOL. Determining recruitment rates and acceptability of this new assessment tool in this population will inform design of a further powered study using the Pregnolia System as the point-of-care, bedside cervical assessment tool within an IOL prediction model. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is sponsored by The University of Liverpool and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05981469, date of registration 7th July 2023.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriDelivery, ObstetricLabor, InducedAdultCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39820788
PMCPMC11737698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.