ArticleCurrent genetics2025
Transcriptional activation and coactivator binding by yeast Ino2 and human proto-oncoprotein c-Myc.
Article in Current genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Basic helix-loop-helix domains in yeast regulatory proteins Ino2 and Ino4 mediate formation of a heterodimer which binds to and activates expression of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. The human proto-oncoprotein c-Myc (Myc) and its binding partner Max activate genes important for cellular proliferation and contain functional domains structure and position of which strongly resembles Ino2 and Ino4. Since Ino2-Myc and Ino4-Max may be considered as orthologs we performed functional comparisons in yeast. We demonstrate that Myc and Max could be stably synthesized in S. cerevisiae and together significantly activated a target gene of Ino2/Ino4 but nevertheless were unable to functionally complement an ino2 ino4 double mutant. We also map two efficient transcriptional activation domains in the N-terminus of Myc (TAD1: aa 1-41 and TAD2: aa 91-140), corresponding to TAD positions in Ino2. We finally show that coactivators such as TFIID subunits Taf1, Taf4, Taf6, Taf10 and Taf12 as well as ATPase subunits of chromatin remodelling complexes Swi2, Sth1 and Ino80 previously shown to interact with TADs of Ino2 were also able to bind TADs of Myc, supporting the view that heterodimers Ino2/Ino4 and Myc/Max are evolutionary related but have undergone transcriptional rewiring of target genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.