Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820706›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2025

Evaluation of a modified venous excess ultrasound (VExUS) protocol for estimation of venous congestion: a cohort study.

Katharine C Martin, Edward A Gill, Ivor J Douglas, August A Longino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Guiding Acute Heart Failure Treatment by Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Validation of a Score Combining Lung Ultrasound and Venous Excess Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharine C MartinDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, 12631 E 17thAvenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Edward A GillDepartment of Cardiology, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ivor J DouglasMedicine, Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Medical School and Denver Health Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
August A LonginoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, 12631 E 17thAvenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. August.Longino@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9963-5425

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding venous congestion is critical to the management of many illnesses, but assessing volume status can be challenging. The current gold standard for volume status assessment of right heart catheterization (RHC) is invasive, costly, and often unavailable. Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) is a novel ultrasound protocol for to assessment of venous congestion using the inferior vena cava, hepatic, portal and renal veins. Though there is a much interest in the technique, the renal component of the exam is challenging to acquire. For this reason we aimed to see if a modified VExUS (mVExUS) excluding the kidney component performs similarly to traditional VExUS (tVExUS) for detecting elevated right atrial pressure (RAP) as measured by RHC.

methodsA consecutive cohort of 95 patients undergoing RHC had VExUS exams before the procedure. Researchers compared the performance of tVExUS, mVExUS, and inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter in predicting RAP > 12 mmHg.

resultsThe area under the curve (AUC) for detecting elevated RAP was similar for tVExUS (0.87) and mVExUS (0.85). Both methods achieved high sensitivity and specificity. Agreement between tVExUS and mVExUS scores was near-perfect (Cohen's Kappa = 0.85).

conclusionmVExUS may be as effective as tVExUS in identifying elevated RAP. This abbreviated version could improve efficiency and adoption of VExUS for assessing venous congestion. Further studies are needed in diverse patient populations.

Identifiers

PMID39820706
PMCPMC11748731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.