ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2025
Pharmacokinetic exposure and treatment outcomes of lenvatinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma and differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Oral TKIs and PARP Inhibitors: A Practical Framework for Clinical Implementation.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAfter initial approval of lenvatinib for radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), it has also shown promising outcomes in among others metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Given that trial populations typically do not represent routine clinical care populations, questions arise about how applicable trial outcomes are in clinical practice. This study aims to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), toxicity patterns, and survival data of lenvatinib in a real-world cohort with DTC and mRCC to those observed in pivotal clinical trials. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients were included when diagnosed with DTC or mRCC, had received current or prior treatment with lenvatinib, and had at least one available lenvatinib plasma concentration measurement. A descriptive comparison was made between the baseline characteristics, PK data, toxicity and survival data in this real-world cohort and those described in the phase III trials.
resultsOverall, 29 patients with mRCC and 35 patients with DTC were included. For mRCC, median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD) was shorter than observed in the phase III trial (7.5 versus 11.0 months) with fewer dose-limiting toxicities, likely because 66% of the patients started with a reduced dose. mRCC patients were more pretreated and had a worse performance status than trial participants. This was resembled in overall lower PK exposure in mRCC patients. For DTC, mTTD was longer in our cohort (17.1 versus 13.8 months), with similar toxicity patterns and PK exposure as in the phase III trial.
conclusionsOur data suggests that patient characteristics and outcomes in routine clinical care deviate from clinical trials and show the need for alternative treatment strategies to manage tolerability to lenvatinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39820703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.