Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820695›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Personalized Dynamic Prediction Model for Biopsy Timing in Patients With Prostate Cancer During Active Surveillance.

Ivo I de Vos, Daan Nieboer, Mark Frydenberg, Christian P Pavlovich, Mieke van Hemelrijck, Lui Shiong Lee, Antti Rannikko, Anders Bjartell, Axel Semjonow, Ewout W Steyerberg and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ivo I de VosErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Daan NieboerErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark FrydenbergCabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Monash University, Sydney, Australia.
Christian P PavlovichThe James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mieke van HemelrijckKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lui Shiong LeeSengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
Antti RannikkoHelsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Anders BjartellSkåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Axel SemjonowProstate Center, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Monique J RoobolErasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Active surveillance (AS) for patients with prostate cancer (PC) often includes fixed repeat prostate biopsies that do not account for the varying risk of reclassification to significant disease. Given the invasive nature and potential complications of biopsies, a personalized approach is needed to balance the burden of biopsies with the risk of missing disease progression. Objective: To develop and externally validate a dynamic model that predicts an individual's risk of PC reclassification during AS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study developed a dynamic prediction model using data from the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study, which was initiated in 2006. Follow-up was truncated until April 2023. External validation was conducted using cohorts from the world's largest centralized AS database, the Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance initiative database. The PRIAS study is a multicenter, prospective, web-based cohort study monitoring patients undergoing AS, involving more than 175 academic, nonacademic, and private centers across 23 countries worldwide. For the development and external validation of the model, all patients diagnosed with Grade Group 1 PC who underwent at least 1 baseline or follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 1 follow-up biopsy were included. Data were analyzed from September 2023 to January 2024. Exposures: AS, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, MRI, and prostate biopsies according to a fixed follow-up schedule. Main Outcomes and Measures: A joint model for longitudinal and time-to-event data was used to predict reclassification to Grade Group 2 or greater on repeat biopsy using predefined baseline and repeated clinical characteristics. Performance was assessed using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and negative predictive value. Results: The development cohort included 2512 patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [59-69] years). Characteristics significantly associated with a higher risk of reclassification were increased age, higher PSA and velocity, lower prostate volume, a suspicious lesion on MRI, and no previous negative biopsy findings. Depending on the threshold and time point used, the model demonstrated a negative predictive value of 86% to 97%. External validation included 3199 patients from 9 other cohorts. The time-dependent area under the curve ranged from 0.81 to 0.84 in the development cohort and 0.52 to 0.90 at external validation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, the developed dynamic risk model effectively identified patients at low risk of PC reclassification during AS. After prospective validation, this model may support personalized, risk-based AS and reduce the burden of unnecessary biopsies.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAgedBiopsyDisease ProgressionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrecision MedicinePrognosisProspective StudiesProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRisk AssessmentTime FactorsProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID39820695
PMCPMC11739991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.