Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820684›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025

In vivo 9.4 Tesla MRI of a patient with drug-resistant epilepsy: Technical report.

Rick H G J van Lanen, Daniel Uher, Desmond H Y Tse, Esther Steijvers, Albert J Colon, Jacobus F A Jansen, Gerhard S Drenthen, Dimo Ivanov, Govert Hoogland, Kim Rijkers and 4 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rick H G J van LanenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands. rick.van.lanen@mumc.nl.
Daniel UherDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Desmond H Y TseScannexus, Ultra-High Field MRI Research Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Esther SteijversScannexus, Ultra-High Field MRI Research Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Albert J ColonAcademic Centre for Epileptology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Heeze, Kempenhaeghe, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Jacobus F A JansenResearch Institute for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Gerhard S DrenthenResearch Institute for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Dimo IvanovDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Govert HooglandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Kim RijkersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Christianne M HoeberigsResearch Institute for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Paul A M HofmanDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Walter H BackesResearch Institute for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Olaf E M G SchijnsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn resective epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRE), good seizure outcome is strongly associated with visualization of an epileptogenic lesion on MRI. Standard clinical MRI (≤ 3 Tesla (T)) may fail to detect subtle lesions. 7T MRI enhances detection and delineation, the potential benefits of increasing field strength to 9.4T are explored.

methodsA 36 years old male patient with DRE evaluated for resective surgery, in which 3T and 7T MRI failed to detect any epileptogenic lesions, was submitted to a dedicated epilepsy scan protocol using T1 and T2* weighted imaging at 9.4T. Images were evaluated independently by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon.

results9.4T MRI offered increased spatial resolution and enhanced depiction of anatomical structures vital for epilepsy imaging, exemplified by regions mesio-temporal (hippocampus, amygdala), latero-temporal, insula, frontal and temporal operculum, and gray-white matter junction (precentral gyrus/frontal lobe) compared to 3T and 7T, albeit with challenges in mesial-temporal and antero-inferior temporal lobe imaging. No epileptogenic lesion was identified.

conclusion9.4T demonstrates promise in the identification and delineation of anatomical structures and small epileptogenic lesions in patients with DRE eligible for resective surgery. Whether clinical 9.4T MRI in DRE has clinical advantages over 7T or leads to a more complete resection of the epileptogenic zone and improved seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery needs to be established.

Indexed as

BrainDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsies, PartialMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultHumansMale9.4TEpilepsyEpilepsy surgeryMRIUHF

Identifiers

PMID39820684
PMCPMC11739318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.