ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Machine learning to predict periprosthetic joint infections following primary total hip arthroplasty using a national database.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning Based Diagnostic Models for Hip and Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction Models for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review of Traditional and Machine Learning Approaches.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Review
- Explainable Machine Learning Predictive Models for Surgical Site Infections: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Who Is the Surgeon Now: Human Hands or Machine Minds? Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics from Diagnosis to Follow-Up-A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Early Prediction of 90-Day Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Hip Arthroplasty for Proximal Femur Fracture Using Machine Learning: Development and Temporal Validation of a Predictive Model.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Probability Scoring Enhances Diagnostic Certainty and Reduces Costs in Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Global trends in biomarker research for periprosthetic joint infection: a bibliometric analysis.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2026Article
- Preoperative Risk Factors and Phenotypic Clustering in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Matched Case-Control Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Beyond Cultures: The Evolving Role of Molecular Diagnostics, Synovial Biomarkers and Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The projected economic burden and complications of revision hip and knee arthroplasties: Insights from national registry studies.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Review
- Agreement Analysis Among Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infections Classifications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains a devastating complication for patients and surgeons. Given the implications of these infections and the current paucity of risk calculators utilizing machine learning (ML), this study aimed to develop an ML algorithm that could accurately identify risk factors for developing a PJI following primary THA using a national database. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 51,053 patients who underwent primary THA between 2013 and 2020 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and immediate postoperative outcomes were collected. Five ML models were created. The receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, slopes, intercepts, and Brier scores were evaluated.
resultsThe histogram-based gradient boosting (HGB) model demonstrated good PJI discriminatory ability with an AUC of 0.88. The test-specific metrics supported the model's performance and validation in predicting PJI (calibration curve slope: 0.79; intercept: 0.32; Brier score: 0.007). The top five predictors of PJI were the length of stay (> 3 days), patient weight at the time of surgery (> 94.3 kg), an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class of 4 or higher, preoperative platelet count (< 249,890/mm3), and preoperative sodium (< 139.5 mEq/L).
conclusionThis study developed a highly specific ML model that could predict patient-specific PJI development following primary THA. Considering the feature importance of the top predictors of infection, surgeons should counsel at-risk patients to optimize resource utilization and potentially improve surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39820648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.