ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
Comparative study of HoLEP in elderly patients with indwelling catheters: a retrospective dual-center study.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of HoLEP Outcomes Between Catheterized and Non-Catheterized Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Lower urinary tract symptoms · 2026Article
- Transurethral resection of the prostate in the extreme elderly (≥ 85 years): treatment success, morbidity and survival.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Ageing patients, missing evidence: the need for more research in the elderly.World journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HoLEP in patients aged > 85 years with indwelling catheter (IDC).
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed our bicentric HoLEP database to identify consecutive patients with IDC and trial without catheter (TWOC) failure who underwent surgery between June 2012 and April 2020. Our primary focus was on the population over 85 years of age; Patients under 70 years of age were used as controls. We evaluated the rate of postoperative spontaneous micturition, adverse events and mortality, as well as catheterization duration, hospital stay, and rate of urinary incontinence.
resultsIn total, 144 patients were included, with 71 (49.3%) and 73 (50.8%) in the ≥ 85 and control group, respectively. The median [IQR] prostatic volume and Charlson score was 90 [70-130] vs. 90 [65-120] mL and 6 [5-7] vs. 3 [2-4] in the ≥ 85 and control groups, respectively. Postoperatively, the rates of major complications (2% vs. 3%) and transfusion (11% vs. 9%) were not significantly different. The median length of stay (2 [1-3] vs. 1 [1-2]; p = 0.03) and rate of TWOC failure during hospitalization (24% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the ≥ 85 group. At 3 months and one year follow-up visits, 0 and 10 patients (14.1%) in the ≥ 85 group and 0 and 2 patients (3%) in the control group died, respectively. One year after surgery, 69 (97%) and 73 (100%) (p = 0.2) patients in the ≥ 85 and control groups, respectively, could void spontaneously.
conclusionHoLEP is a safe and effective procedure for elderly patients with indwelling catheters. At one year, 97% of patients achieved spontaneous voiding, while the urinary incontinence rate was 11%. The 1-year mortality rate was 14%, comparable to that of the general male population of the same age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39820625What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.