Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820621›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2025

Endovascular management of haemorrhage and vascular lesions in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Hans-Joachim Wagner, Käthe Goossen, Peter Hilbert-Carius, Rainer Braunschweig, Daniela Kildal, Daniel Hinck, Thomas Albrecht, Nadja Könsgen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hans-Joachim WagnerInstitute of Radiology and Interventional Therapy, Vivantes am Urban Hospital and Vivantes im Friedrichshain Hospital, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2915-4455
Käthe GoossenInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany. kaethe.goossen@uni-wh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1436-1144
Peter Hilbert-CariusDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, Bergmannstrost Hospital, Halle, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-2377
Rainer BraunschweigWorking Group on Musculoskeletal Imaging of the German Radiological Society, Berlin, Germany.
Daniela KildalDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
Daniel HinckFaculty of the Medical Service and Health Sciences, Bundeswehr Command and Staff College, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1226-4244
Thomas AlbrechtInstitute of Radiology and Interventional Therapy, Vivantes Neukölln Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Nadja KönsgenInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5387-7119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to update evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations for the inhospital endovascular management of haemorrhage and vascular lesions in patients with multiple and/or severe injuries based on current evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German Guideline on the Treatment of Patients with Multiple and/or Severe Injuries.

methodsMEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to June 2021. Further literature reports were obtained from clinical experts. Randomised controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and comparative registry studies were included if they compared endovascular interventions for bleeding control such as embolisation, stent or stent-graft placement, or balloon occlusion against control interventions in patients with polytrauma and/or severe injuries in the hospital setting. The diagnosis of pelvic haemorrhage was added post-hoc as an additional clinical question. We considered patient-relevant clinical outcomes such as mortality, bleeding control, haemodynamic stability, transfusion requirements, complications, and diagnostic test accuracy. Risk of bias was assessed using NICE 2012 checklists. The evidence was synthesised narratively, and expert consensus was used to develop recommendations and determine their strength.

resultsForty-three new studies were identified. Interventions covered were resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) (n = 20), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) (n = 9 studies), pelvic trauma (n = 6), endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic injuries (n = 3), maxillofacial and carotid artery injuries (n = 2), embolisation for abdominal organ injuries (n = 2), and diagnosis of pelvic haemorrhage (n = 1). Five recommendations were modified, and one additional recommendation was developed. All achieved strong consensus.

conclusionThe following key recommendations are made. Whole-body contrast-enhanced computed tomography should be used to detect bleeding and vascular injuries. Blunt thoracic and abdominal aortic injuries should be managed using TEVAR/EVAR. If possible, endovascular treatment should be delayed beyond 24 h after injury. Bleeding from parenchymatous abdominal organs should be controlled using transarterial catheter embolisation. Splenic injuries that require no immediate intervention can be managed with observation.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresHemorrhageMultiple TraumaVascular System InjuriesBalloon OcclusionEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicArterial embolisationEndovascular repairHaemorrhagePolytrauma guidelineREBOATraumatic arterial injury

Identifiers

PMID39820621
PMCPMC11739259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.