ArticlePloS one2025
Prevalence of keratoconus and keratoconus suspect, and their characteristics on corneal tomography in a population-based study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Microcirculation at the Optic Nerve Head in Eyes With Keratoconus.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Patients with Keratoconus in an Optometry Clinic in the Palestinian Authority.Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal disorder resulting in severe visual impairment. We aimed to determine the prevalence and corneal tomographic characteristics of KC and keratoconus suspect (KCS) in a population-based study, and to construct discrimination models with or without corneal tomography. A total of 1,544 eyes (822 participants aged ≥35 years) were evaluated using data from the Yamagata Study (2015-2017). Systemic and ophthalmological examinations including corneal tomography with swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were conducted to determine the prevalence and corneal tomographic characteristics of KC and KCS. In addition, data on 766 eyes were used to construct discrimination models with or without corneal tomography. In results, KC was diagnosed in six (0.85%) participants, and KCS was diagnosed in 27 (1.46%) participants. The values including corneal power, keratometric cylinder, corneal central and thinnest thickness, corneal asymmetry, higher-order irregularity, and their inter-eye differences were associated with KC and KCS. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the three multivariate discrimination models (without corneal tomography, with corneal tomography, and without corneal tomography + inter-eye difference models) for participants with KC or KCS were 0.848, 1.000, and 0.930, respectively. When corneal tomography is unavailable, inter-eye differences in corneal parameters may be useful screening tools for KC and KCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.