Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820510›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimal parameter identification of photovoltaic systems based on enhanced differential evolution optimization technique.

Shubhranshu Mohan Parida, Vivekananda Pattanaik, Subhasis Panda, Pravat Kumar Rout, Binod Kumar Sahu, Mohit Bajaj, Vojtech Blazek, Lukas Prokop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shubhranshu Mohan ParidaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Vivekananda PattanaikDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Subhasis PandaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pravat Kumar RoutDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Binod Kumar SahuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Mohit BajajDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Dehradun, 248002, India. mohitbajaj.ee@geu.ac.in.
Vojtech BlazekENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, 708 00, Czech Republic.
Lukas ProkopENET Centre, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, 708 00, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports TN02000025 National Centre for Energy IIMinistry of the Environment of the Czech Republic CZ.10.03.01/00/22_003/0000048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the parameters of a solar photovoltaic (PV) model optimally, is necessary for simulation, performance assessment, and design verification. However, precise PV cell modelling is critical for design due to many critical factors, such as inherent nonlinearity, existing complexity, and a wide range of model parameters. Although different researchers have recently proposed several effective techniques for solar PV system parameter identification, it is still an interesting challenge for researchers to enhance the accuracy of the PV system modelling. With the above motivation, this article suggests a stage-specific mutation strategy for the proposed enhanced differential evolution (EDE) that adopts a better search process to arrive at optimal solutions by adaptively varying the mutation factor and crossover rate at different search stages. The optimal identification of PV systems is formulated as a single objective function. It appears in the form of the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) between the PV model current from the experimental data and the current calculated using the identified parameters considering the parameter constraints (limits). The I-V (current-voltage) characteristics/data with identified parameters are validated with the experimental data to justify the proposed approach's accuracy and efficacy for different cells and modules. Extensive simulation has been demonstrated considering two different PV cells (RTC France & PVM-752-GaAs) and three different PV modules (ND-R250A5, STM6 40/36 & STP6 120/36). The results obtained from the proposed EDE technique show Root Mean Square Errors (RMSE) of 7.730062e-4, 7.419648e-4, and 7.33228e-4 respectively, in parameter identification of RTC France PV cell models based on single, double, and triple diodes. Also, the RMSE involved in parameter identification of PVM-752-GaAs PV cell models based on single, double, and triple diodes are 1.59256e-4, 1.408989e-4, and 1.30181e-4, respectively. The parameters identification of ND-R250A5, STM6 40/36 and STP6 120/36 PV modules involve RMSE values of 7.697716e-3, 1.772095e-3, and 1.224258e-2, respectively. All these RMSE values obtained with proposed EDE are the least as compared to other well-accepted algorithms, thereby justifying its higher accuracy.

Indexed as

Enhanced differential evolutionMetaheuristic algorithmOptimization techniqueParameter identificationPV model

Identifiers

PMID39820510
PMCPMC11739471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.