ArticleNature communications2025
Uncovering the whole genome silencers of human cells via Ss-STARR-seq.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Coding Negative Regulatory Features in Livestock Genomes: Functional Annotation and Causal Validation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- ATACdb 2.0: a comprehensive chromatin accessibility database of human and mouse.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Quantifying the impact of genetic mutations on enhancer dynamics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Applications of high-throughput reporter assays to gene regulation studies.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Coregulators determine androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer.Bioscience reports · 2025Review
- Genome-Wide Silencer Screening Reveals Key Silencer Modulating Reprogramming Efficiency in Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Perspective on recent developments and challenges in regulatory and systems genomics.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Silencers, the yin to enhancers' yang, play a pivotal role in fine-tuning gene expression throughout the genome. However, despite their recognized importance, comprehensive identification of these regulatory elements in the genome is still in its early stages. We developed a method called Ss-STARR-seq to directly determine the activity of silencers in the whole genome. In this study, we applied Ss-STARR-seq to human cell lines K562, LNCaP, and 293 T, and identified 134,171, 137,753, and 125,307 silencers on a genome-wide scale, respectively, these silencers function in various cells in a cell-specific manner. Silencers exhibited a substantial enrichment of transcriptional-inhibitory motifs, including REST, and demonstrated overlap with the binding sites of repressor transcription factors within the endogenous environment. Interestingly, H3K27me3 did not reflect silencer activity but facilitated the silencer's inhibitory role on gene expression. Additionally, the silencer did not have any significant histone markers at the genome-wide level. Our findings unveil that aspect-silencers not only transition into enhancers throughout diverse cell lines but also achieve functional conversion with insulators. Regarding to biological effects, knockout experiments underscored the functional redundancy and specificity of silencers in regulating gene expression and cell proliferation. In summary, this study pioneers the elucidation of the genome-wide silencer landscape in human cells, delineates their global regulatory features, and identifies specific silencers influencing cancer cell proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.