ReviewArchives of microbiology2025
Recent advances in rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori by lateral flow assay.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Approaches to Bacterial Identification: A Review of Classical and Modern Techniques.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A rapid and accurate method forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infection with H. pylori (Helicobacter pylori) is the most prevalent human infection worldwide and is strongly associated with many gastrointestinal disorders, including gastric cancer. Endoscopy is mainly used to diagnose H. pylori infection in gastric biopsies. However, this approach is invasive, time-consuming and expensive. On the other hand, serology-based methods can be considered as a non-invasive approach to detecting H. pylori infection. The LFA (lateral flow assay) serves as a rapid point-of-care diagnostic tool. This paper-based platform facilitates the detection and quantification of analytes within human fluids such as blood, serum and urine. Due to ease of production, rapid results, and low costs, LFAs have a wide application in clinical laboratories and hospitals. In this comprehensive review, we examined LFA-based approaches for detection of H. pylori infection from human fluids and compare them with other high-sensitivity methods like ELISA (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). Furthermore, we reviewed methods to elevate LFA sensitivity during H. pylori infection including, CRISPR/Cas system and isothermal amplification approaches. The development and optimization of novel labeling agents such as nanozyme to enhance the performance of LFA devices in detecting H. pylori were reviewed. These innovations aim to improve signal amplification and stability, thereby increasing the diagnostic accuracy of LFA devices. A combination of advances in LFA technology and molecular insight could significantly improve diagnostic accuracy, resulting in a significant improvement in clinical and remote diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39820420What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.