ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Growth of Private Equity and Hospital Consolidation in Primary Care and Price Implications.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Medical-Legal Partnership as Value-Based Primary Care: Interprofessional Teamwork for Health-Related Social Needs.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Review
- Rural Hospital Closures, Hospital Spatial Accessibility, and Preventive Care Receipt in the US South: A Cross-Sectional Ecological Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Private Equity Acquisition in Primary Care and Avoidable Hospitalizations.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Prior Authorization and Associated Delays and Denials of Branded Medication Dispensation.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Commercial Prices for Primary Care Physician Office Visits.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Observational
- Medicare appointment availability and wait times vary considerably across four large US urban markets.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Geographic and Policy Factors Influence Telehealth Availability for Substance Use Disorder Treatment.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2026Article
- Growth In Number Of Practices And Clinicians Participating In Concierge And Direct Primary Care, 2018-23.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2025Article
- Price Transparency and Patient Empowerment.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2025Article
- A Look Ahead for Health Policy and Health Services Research.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
- The changing landscape of primary care: an analysis of payer-primary care integration.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- The Expansion Dilemma: A Critical Look at the 13-Year Increase in Emergency Medicine Residency Positions.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Consolidation of physician practices by hospitals and private equity (PE) firms has increased rapidly. This trend is of particular importance within primary care. Despite its significance, there is no systematic evidence on the emerging trends in ownership affiliation of primary care physicians (PCPs) and its association with prices paid for physician services. Objective: To describe trends in hospital affiliation and PE affiliation in primary care and examine variation in negotiated prices paid by commercial insurers to hospital-affiliated, PE-affiliated, and independent PCPs. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data from PitchBook and IQVIA were used to examine hospital and PE affiliation PCPs. PCPs and their affiliations were linked to novel cross-sectional Transparency in Coverage data. A total of 226.6 million negotiated prices were analyzed for evaluation and management office visits (Current Procedural Terminology codes 99202 to 99205 and 99212 to 99215) across 4 national insurers (Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, and United Healthcare). Linear regressions were used to examine the association between hospital-affiliated, PE-affiliated, and independent PCPs and cross-sectional prices paid for physician services, with fixed effects for service, state, and insurers. Data were collected from January to June 2024, and data were analyzed from July to October 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of PCPs that are affiliated with hospitals and PE from 2009 to 2022. Using cross-sectional data from 2022, negotiated prices paid to physicians (physician professional fee) for office visits. Results: A total of 198 097 PCPs were analyzed. PCPs affiliated with hospitals increased from 25.2% (28 216 of 111 793) in 2009 to 47.9% in 2022 (82 890 of 172 964). Over the same period, 1.5% (2483 of 172 964) of PCPs became affiliated with PE firms. Relative to independent PCPs, negotiated prices for office visits were $14.91 (95% CI, 8.92-27.64) or 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1-11.4) higher for hospital-affiliated PCPs (P < .001) and $9.56 (95% CI, 2.24-14.55) or 7.8% (95% CI, 4.7-10.8) higher for PE-affiliated PCPs (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, nearly one-half of all PCPs were affiliated with hospitals, while PE-affiliated PCPs were growing and concentrated in certain regional markets. Relative to PCPs in independent settings, hospital-affiliated PCPs and PE-affiliated PCPs had higher prices for the same services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.