Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820248›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Artificial intelligence in cryo-EM protein particle picking: recent advances and remaining challenges.

Ashwin Dhakal, Rajan Gyawali, Liguo Wang, Jianlin Cheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Artificial intelligence in structural biology: Preface.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Labeled Dataset for AI-based Cryo-EM Map Enhancement.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A labeled dataset for AI-based cryo-EM map enhancement.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. CryoTEN: Efficiently Enhancing Cryo-EM Density Maps Using Transformers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashwin DhakalDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4047-9947
Rajan GyawaliDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7052-4964
Liguo WangLaboratory for BioMolecular Structure (LBMS), Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, United States.
Jianlin ChengDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-2853

Funding

Deep learning methods for automated and accurate reconstruction of protein structures from cryo-EM image dataR01GM146340 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2022 to 2025
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146340NIH HHS R01GM146340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has revolutionized structural biology by enabling the determination of high-resolution 3-Dimensional (3D) structures of large biological macromolecules. Protein particle picking, the process of identifying individual protein particles in cryo-EM micrographs for building protein structures, has progressed from manual and template-based methods to sophisticated artificial intelligence (AI)-driven approaches in recent years. This review critically examines the evolution and current state of cryo-EM particle picking methods, with an emphasis on the impact of AI. We conducted a comparative evaluation of popular AI-based particle picking methods, using both general machine learning metrics and specific cryo-EM structure determination metrics. This analysis involved constructing the 3D density map from the picked protein particles and assessing the obtained resolution and particle orientation diversity, underscoring the significant impact of AI on cryo-EM particle picking. Despite the advancements, we also identified key obstacles, such as handling complex micrographs with small proteins. The analysis provides insights into the future development of more sophisticated and fully automated AI methods in cryo-EM particle recognition.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCryoelectron MicroscopyProteinsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalProteinsartificial intelligencecryo-electron microscopymachine learningprotein particle pickingstructural biology

Identifiers

PMID39820248
PMCPMC11736895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.