ArticlePloS one2025
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting left atrial thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast in non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a nomogram with machine learning-assisted feature selection for predicting left atrial appendage thrombosis and severe spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Ensemble Predictive Model for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2026Article
- Machine-learning model for predicting left atrial thrombus in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLeft atrial thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast (LAT/SEC) are widely recognized as significant contributors to cardiogenic embolism in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). This study aimed to construct and validate an interpretable predictive model of LAT/SEC risk in NVAF patients using machine learning (ML) methods.
methodsElectronic medical records (EMR) data of consecutive NVAF patients scheduled for catheter ablation at the First Hospital of Jilin University from October 1, 2022, to February 1, 2024, were analyzed. A retrospective study of 1,222 NVAF patients was conducted. Nine ML algorithms combined with demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were applied to develop prediction models for LAT/SEC in NVAF patients. Feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Multiple ML classification models were integrated to identify the optimal model, and Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) interpretation was utilized for personalized risk assessment. Diagnostic performances of the optimal model and the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system for predicting LAT/SEC risk in NVAF were compared.
resultsAmong 1,078 patients included, the incidence of LAT/SEC was 10.02%. Six independent predictors, including age, non-paroxysmal AF, diabetes, ischemic stroke or thromboembolism (IS/TE), hyperuricemia, and left atrial diameter (LAD), were identified as the most valuable features. The logistic classification model exhibited the best performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.850, accuracy of 0.812, sensitivity of 0.818, and specificity of 0.780 in the test set. SHAP analysis revealed the contribution of explanatory variables to the model and their relationship with LAT/SEC occurrence. The logistic regression model significantly outperformed the CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system, with AUCs of 0.831 and 0.650, respectively (Z = 7.175, P < 0.001).
conclusionsML proves to be a reliable tool for predicting LAT/SEC risk in NVAF patients. The constructed logistic regression model, along with SHAP interpretation, may serve as a clinically useful tool for identifying high-risk NVAF patients. This enables targeted diagnostic evaluations and the development of personalized treatment strategies based on the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.