Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39820167›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Gaussian barebone mechanism and wormhole strategy enhanced moth flame optimization for global optimization and medical diagnostics.

Jingjing Ma, Zhifang Zhao, Lin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingjing MaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Third Ward, The First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Zhifang ZhaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0004-4421-0648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moth Flame Optimization (MFO) is a swarm intelligence algorithm inspired by the nocturnal flight mode of moths, and it has been widely used in various fields due to its simple structure and high optimization efficiency. Nonetheless, a notable limitation is its susceptibility to local optimality because of the absence of a well-balanced exploitation and exploration phase. Hence, this paper introduces a novel enhanced MFO algorithm (BWEMFO) designed to improve algorithmic performance. This improvement is achieved by incorporating a Gaussian barebone mechanism, a wormhole strategy, and an elimination strategy into the MFO. To assess the effectiveness of BWEMFO, a series of comparison experiments is conducted, comparing it against conventional metaheuristic algorithms, advanced metaheuristic algorithms, and various MFO variants. The experimental results reveal a significant enhancement in both the convergence speed and the capability to escape local optima with the implementation of BWEMFO. The scalability of the algorithm is confirmed through benchmark functions. Employing BWEMFO, we optimize the kernel parameters of the kernel-limit learning machine, thereby crafting the BWEMFO-KELM methodology for medical diagnosis and prediction. Subsequently, BWEMFO-KELM undergoes diagnostic and predictive experimentation on three distinct medical datasets: the breast cancer dataset, colorectal cancer datasets, and mammographic dataset. Through comparative analysis against five alternative machine learning methodologies across four evaluation metrics, our experimental findings evince the superior diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the proposed BWEMFO-KELM model.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMothsAnimalsHumansMachine LearningNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID39820167
PMCPMC11737686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.