ArticlePloS one2025
Stochastic variation in foraging traits within inbred lines of Drosophila.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating the causes and consequences of niche partitioning in populations is a major goal in ecology and evolutionary biology. Previous studies have investigated genetic and environmentally induced variation in resource utility and their ecological implications. However, few studies have explored variability (non-genetic, stochastic variation) as a factor contributing to variation in resource utility. In this study, we studied the variability in foraging traits of Drosophila lutescens, a species of wild fruit fly. Using 70 iso-female lines from a single population, we observed two foraging traits, i.e., locomotive speed and resource preferences, in an "8"-shaped experimental arena containing different types of fruit juices. The mean locomotive speed and relative preference for orange juice over grape juice varied significantly among iso-female lines. Additionally, the degree of intraline variation (variability) was detected a fold-change of larger than 2-fold between the smallest line and the largest line. While the mean locomotive speed itself did not correlate with mean resource preferences, the variability of locomotive speed significantly correlated with that of resource preferences. These results suggest that the degree of variability within inbred lines for both locomotive activity and resource preference is potentially partly genetic and that a shared genetic basis may govern variability in these traits. The variability of a particular trait is considered to interact cooperatively with the variability of several other traits in creating phenotypic intraspecific variation within a population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.