ReviewNature protocols2025
PEPPI-MS: gel-based sample pre-fractionation for deep top-down and middle-down proteomics.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Novel Protein Recovery Method via Gel Separation and Silica Columns Capable of Rapid Antigen Purification and Deep Proteomic Identification.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Advances in Mass Spectrometry Instrumentation and Methodology for Analysis of Alternative Protein Isoforms.Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2026Review
- Enhancing Proteoform Sequence Coverage Using Top-Down Mass Spectrometry with In-Source Fragmentation and Middle-Down Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- PEPPI-SP3: A Gel-Based High-Resolution Sample Preparation Workflow for In-Depth Top-Down Analysis of Intact Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Combining SDS-PAGE with Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics Analysis of Intact Histone Proteoforms.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Top-Down Proteomics: Why and When?Proteomics · 2025Article
- Cysteine-Directed Isobaric Labeling Combined with GeLC-FAIMS-MS for Quantitative Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Top-down analysis of intact proteins and middle-down analysis of proteins subjected to limited digestion require efficient detection of traces of proteoforms in samples, necessitating the reduction of sample complexity by thorough pre-fractionation of the proteome components in the sample. SDS-PAGE is a simple and inexpensive high-resolution protein-separation technique widely used in biochemical and molecular biology experiments. Although its effectiveness for sample preparation in bottom-up proteomics has been proven, establishing a method for highly efficient recovery of intact proteins from the gel matrix has long been a challenge for its implementation in top-down and middle-down proteomics. As a much-awaited solution to this problem, we present an experimental protocol for efficient proteoform fractionation from complex biological samples using passively eluting proteins from polyacrylamide gels as intact species for mass spectrometry (PEPPI-MS), a rapid method for extraction of intact proteins separated by SDS-PAGE. PEPPI-MS allows recovery of proteins below 100 kDa separated by SDS-PAGE in solution with a median efficiency of 68% within 10 min and, unlike conventional electroelution methods, requires no special equipment, contributing to a remarkably economical implementation. The entire protocol from electrophoresis to protein purification can be performed in <5 h. By combining the resulting PEPPI fraction with other protein-separation techniques, such as reversed-phase liquid chromatography and ion mobility techniques, multidimensional proteome separations for in-depth proteoform analysis can be easily achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39820051What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.