Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819978›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2025

Analyzing Geospatial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening Among Populations in the United States: Machine Learning Approach.

Soheil Hashtarkhani, Yiwang Zhou, Fekede Asefa Kumsa, Shelley White-Means, David L Schwartz, Arash Shaban-Nejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Call to Integrate Measures of Environmental Context into Research on Maternal Brain Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Soheil HashtarkhaniCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 50 N. Dunlap St, Memphis, TN, 38103, United States, 1 9012875836.ORCID 0000-0001-7750-6294
Yiwang ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8023-205X
Fekede Asefa KumsaCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 50 N. Dunlap St, Memphis, TN, 38103, United States, 1 9012875836.ORCID 0000-0002-6700-4810
Shelley White-MeansCollege of Graduate Health Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3212-8060
David L SchwartzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-5586
Arash Shaban-NejadCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 50 N. Dunlap St, Memphis, TN, 38103, United States, 1 9012875836.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-4759

Funding

Policy Pathways to Breast Health Equity in Racially Segregated Areas with Concentrated PovertyR01MD018766 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI Shelley White-Means · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD018766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer screening plays a pivotal role in early detection and subsequent effective management of the disease, impacting patient outcomes and survival rates. Objective: This study aims to assess breast cancer screening rates nationwide in the United States and investigate the impact of social determinants of health on these screening rates. Methods: Data on mammography screening at the census tract level for 2018 and 2020 were collected from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We developed a large-scale dataset of social determinants of health, comprising 13 variables for 72,337 census tracts. Spatial analysis employing Getis-Ord Gi statistics was used to identify clusters of high and low breast cancer screening rates. To evaluate the influence of these social determinants, we implemented a random forest model, with the aim of comparing its performance to linear regression and support vector machine models. The models were evaluated using R2 and root mean squared error metrics. Shapley Additive Explanations values were subsequently used to assess the significance of variables and direction of their influence. Results: Geospatial analysis revealed elevated screening rates in the eastern and northern United States, while central and midwestern regions exhibited lower rates. The random forest model demonstrated superior performance, with an R2=64.53 and root mean squared error of 2.06, compared to linear regression and support vector machine models. Shapley Additive Explanations values indicated that the percentage of the Black population, the number of mammography facilities within a 10-mile radius, and the percentage of the population with at least a bachelor's degree were the most influential variables, all positively associated with mammography screening rates. Conclusions: These findings underscore the significance of social determinants and the accessibility of mammography services in explaining the variability of breast cancer screening rates in the United States, emphasizing the need for targeted policy interventions in areas with relatively lower screening rates.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHealthcare DisparitiesMachine LearningMammographyAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSocial Determinants of HealthSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial AnalysisUnited Statesbreast neoplasmsgeographic information systemsmachine learningmammographysocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39819978
PMCPMC11756836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.