ArticleBMJ open2025
How many stroke survivors develop problematic spasticity requiring pharmacological therapy? An international (Europe and USA) observational study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06055725 (A Prospective, Multicountry Study to Estimate the Incidence of and Provide a Best Practice Model for Monitoring the Development of Post-Stroke Spasticity), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multicountry Study to Estimate the Incidence of and Provide a Best Practice Model for Monitoring the Development of Post-Stroke Spasticity
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCurrent care plans for stroke survivors typically focus on acute management, resulting in many stroke survivors being discharged to their communities without adequate follow-up, despite their often experiencing significant post-stroke complications, such as post-stroke spasticity (PSS). While studies have explored the incidence and prevalence of PSS, little is known about how early PSS develops and how many stroke survivors develop 'problematic' PSS that would benefit from pharmacological treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EPITOME is a prospective, international, observational, epidemiological study of participants (aged 18-90 years) who develop paresis within days 3-14 of a first-ever stroke that occurred within the past 4 weeks. Participants at sites across seven different countries are monitored remotely at 2 weeks and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-stroke to detect the possible onset of PSS using the Post-stroke Spasticity Monitoring Questionnaire (PSMQ). If the PSMQ indicates the possible presence of PSS, participants undergo a full in-clinic assessment to confirm the presence of PSS. For participants with confirmed PSS, the severity and distribution of spasticity is documented, and the investigator assesses whether the participant has spasticity that could benefit from pharmacological therapy. Participants without clinically confirmed PSS return to remote monitoring. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained in all seven participating countries. Results will be published at international meetings and in an international peer-reviewed journal. Lay summaries will be prepared to accompany the primary paper and will also be provided to study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06055725.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.