Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39819949›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

How many stroke survivors develop problematic spasticity requiring pharmacological therapy? An international (Europe and USA) observational study protocol.

Richard D Zorowitz, Laura Serrano Barrenechea, Simon Butet, Sergiu Groppa, David Hernández Herrero, Rama Prasad, Susan Sandars, Seema Meloni, Simon Page, Pascal Maisonobe and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06055725 (A Prospective, Multicountry Study to Estimate the Incidence of and Provide a Best Practice Model for Monitoring the Development of Post-Stroke Spasticity), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06055725 active not recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective, Multicountry Study to Estimate the Incidence of and Provide a Best Practice Model for Monitoring the Development of Post-Stroke Spasticity

TypeobservationalSponsorIpsenRan2023 to 2027Enrolled1,058ConditionsSpasticity as Sequela of Stroke
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Richard D ZorowitzMedStar National Rehabilitation Network and Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA richard.zorowitz@medstar.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8938-786X
Laura Serrano BarrenecheaSouthern Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, Sweden.
Simon ButetCHU Pontchaillou, Rennes, France.
Sergiu GroppaUniversity Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
David Hernández HerreroLa Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rama PrasadLeicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Susan SandarsDifferent Strokes, Gloucester, UK.
Seema MeloniIpsen, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Simon PageIpsen Group, Slough, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7225-3774
Pascal MaisonobeBiostatistics & Data Management, Ipsen Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Alessandro PicelliUniversity of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent care plans for stroke survivors typically focus on acute management, resulting in many stroke survivors being discharged to their communities without adequate follow-up, despite their often experiencing significant post-stroke complications, such as post-stroke spasticity (PSS). While studies have explored the incidence and prevalence of PSS, little is known about how early PSS develops and how many stroke survivors develop 'problematic' PSS that would benefit from pharmacological treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: EPITOME is a prospective, international, observational, epidemiological study of participants (aged 18-90 years) who develop paresis within days 3-14 of a first-ever stroke that occurred within the past 4 weeks. Participants at sites across seven different countries are monitored remotely at 2 weeks and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-stroke to detect the possible onset of PSS using the Post-stroke Spasticity Monitoring Questionnaire (PSMQ). If the PSMQ indicates the possible presence of PSS, participants undergo a full in-clinic assessment to confirm the presence of PSS. For participants with confirmed PSS, the severity and distribution of spasticity is documented, and the investigator assesses whether the participant has spasticity that could benefit from pharmacological therapy. Participants without clinically confirmed PSS return to remote monitoring. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained in all seven participating countries. Results will be published at international meetings and in an international peer-reviewed journal. Lay summaries will be prepared to accompany the primary paper and will also be provided to study participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06055725.

Indexed as

Muscle SpasticityStrokeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicProspective StudiesSurvivorsUnited StatesEPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIESRehabilitation medicineStroke

Identifiers

PMID39819949
PMCPMC11751951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.